104
Points
74
Comments
TechTechTech
Author

Top Comments

jonhohleMay 29
I’ve thought about how to introduce a bill and find sponsors for extending first sale and related rights to digital goods. I understand the current terms and licensing, but we’ve lost too much to non-transferable contracts and millennials and later will likely have no books, music, or games that can be inherited by their children. It’s crazy that after thousands of years of sharing copies of writings, hundreds of years of sharing recordings, and decades of sharing games, we’re going to give it all up because it’s a license now.

The problem is, where to even start? I would think EFF would be spearheading something like this, but I haven’t come across anything. There have been attempts in the past, but they don’t seem to have ongoing support.

vlMay 29
They are going to do what movie industry is already doing: create shell company for release of each game.

Then they will shut down the company when they want, and there will be nobody to come for.

phreackMay 29
> The bill applies to digitally sold games. However, it excludes games provided via subscription services, free-to-play games, and games that are inherently playable offline indefinitely. It also prohibits the continued sale or distribution of games that have become unusable due to service termination.

I believe this is the key paragraph. I wonder if this will be an incentive towards making more games qualify for those exceptions. I think the previous cases where this act would apply are few but good thing they wouldn't increase under this act.

Manuel_DMay 29
Releasing server-side code would be a non-starter for lots of companies. For one, many of them don't actually own all of the code they use to implement the game server. There's lots of proprietary middleware in use in online games.

Perhaps a workaround is to just have 1 server online indefinitely. Technically the online services are still functional - the match queue times would just be very, very large.

gib444May 29
[delayed]
wagwangMay 29
The reasonable compromise should be to force devs to release server binaries if they are not willing to run the servers themselves.
okdood64May 29
This what California's political machinery is focused on? Rather than the colossal waste that is the high speed rail project, or rampant corrupt use of State and local funds for social welfare projects that go nowhere?

I understand you can focus on two things at the same time, and moonshot projects are worth it. (More NASA funding please.) But as a California taxpayer I can't take our government seriously.

charcircuitMay 29
So just make every game free to play and then require a paying to unlock the actual game.
Visit the Original Link

Read the full content on invenglobal.com

Source
invenglobal.com
Author
TechTechTech
Posted
May 29, 2026 at 07:55 PM


More Top Stories

obeli.sk May 29
SQLite is all you need for durable workflows
16583 commentsby tomasol
Details
owenmcgrann.com May 29
The dead economy theory
446607 commentsby WillDaSilva
Details
koenvangilst.nl May 29
Notes from the Mistral AI Now Summit in Paris
26469 commentsby vnglst
Details
pierre.computer May 29
On Rendering Diffs
8327 commentsby amadeus
Details
inkandswitch.com May 29
Bijou64: A variable-length integer encoding
17766 commentsby justinweiss
Details
jeffgeerling.com May 29
It's hard to justify buying a Framework 12
143245 commentsby watermelon0
Details
👋 Need help with code?