Best API Monitoring Tools in 2026: What Developers Actually Use

Your API returned a 200 OK. The response body was empty. The mobile app crashed for 40,000 users, and you found out when someone posted a screenshot on Twitter. Traditional uptime monitoring would have told you the endpoint was "up" — because it was. The server responded. It just responded with nothing useful.

API monitoring goes beyond ping checks. It validates that your endpoints return the right status codes, the right headers, and the right response bodies. It tests multi-step workflows — authenticate, create a resource, verify the response, delete it — the same sequences your users execute every minute. When any step in that chain breaks, you need to know before your customers file tickets.

We tested seven API monitoring tools against real-world API validation scenarios: response body assertions, multi-step workflows, authentication handling, alerting speed, and pricing at scale. Every price below was verified against official pricing pages in June 2026.

TL;DR comparison

How we evaluated

API monitoring is not uptime monitoring with extra steps. The distinction matters because most tools that claim "API monitoring" only check HTTP status codes and response times — they don't validate what the API actually returns. We evaluated each tool on five capabilities that separate real API monitoring from rebranded ping checks: response body validation (can you assert on JSON paths, regex patterns, or exact values in the response?), assertion types (status code, headers, response time thresholds, body content — how granular can you get?), multi-step workflows (can you chain API calls, extract values from one response and use them in the next request, simulating real user flows?), alerting latency (how fast does the tool detect a failure and notify your team — seconds or minutes?), and pricing model (per-seat, per-check, per-run, or flat-rate — and what happens when you scale?).

Full feature comparison

DevHelm

DevHelm treats API monitoring as a first-class workflow, not a premium add-on. Every monitor — including the free tier — supports custom request headers, request bodies (POST, PUT, PATCH), response body assertions, and status code validation. You configure checks through a CLI, Terraform provider, or SDKs, which means your API monitoring configuration lives in version control alongside your infrastructure code.

Where DevHelm differentiates is the pricing model. Every tier is a flat monthly rate with no per-user, per-run, or per-seat multipliers. The Pro tier at $29/mo includes multi-step API checks that chain requests, pass tokens between steps, and validate each response in sequence — the kind of flow where you authenticate, create a resource, verify the response body, and clean up. Response time tracking, SSL monitoring, and alerting integrations work across all tiers.

DevHelm does not offer browser-level synthetic monitoring. If you need to simulate a user clicking through a React dashboard or filling out a multi-page form, you'll need a browser-based tool like Checkly or Datadog. For API-layer monitoring — validating endpoints, testing webhooks, checking that your REST or GraphQL API returns correct responses — DevHelm covers the workflow at a fraction of the cost.

Key strengths

• Response body assertions (keyword match, status code, header validation) included on all tiers including Free
• Custom request headers and request bodies on every plan — no paywall for POST/PUT monitoring
• Multi-step API checks on Pro ($29/mo) that chain requests and pass data between steps
• CLI + Terraform + SDK — monitors defined as code, version-controlled, deployed in CI/CD
• Flat pricing with no per-user or per-check-run charges
• 30-second check intervals on Pro and above
• Status pages that auto-update from monitor state — no separate integration needed

Pricing

Cost traps

• No browser-based synthetic checks — if you need DOM interaction testing, you need a second tool
• Multi-step checks require Pro ($29/mo) — Free and Starter are single-request only
• Environment variables (for staging vs. production API checks) are Pro+ only

Limitations

• No APM or distributed tracing integration — it's a monitoring tool, not an observability platform
• Smaller global probe network than Datadog or Checkly (expanding, but currently 6+ regions)
• No built-in load testing or performance benchmarking

Best for: Teams that want full API monitoring (headers, bodies, multi-step flows) with config-as-code and flat pricing, and don't need browser-level synthetic checks.

Checkly

Checkly pioneered the monitoring-as-code approach. API checks are written in TypeScript or JavaScript, stored in your repository, and deployed through Checkly's CLI. This means your monitoring logic gets code review, version history, and CI/CD deployment — the same workflow as your application code.

The flexibility of code-based checks is Checkly's strongest differentiator. Instead of filling out a form to configure an API check, you write a script. Need to validate a nested JSON path, parse a JWT from the response, compare values against a dynamic threshold, or test a GraphQL subscription? Write the assertion in TypeScript. The trade-off is that basic checks — "does this endpoint return 200?" — require more setup than point-and-click tools.

Checkly's multistep API checks (Team tier, $64/mo) chain multiple HTTP requests in a single script, with full access to Node.js libraries for parsing, transforming, and validating responses between steps. The Terraform provider and GitHub integration make it straightforward to add monitoring as part of your deploy pipeline — run checks post-deploy, gate releases on check results, and alert if a deploy breaks an API contract.

Key strengths

• Full TypeScript/JavaScript for check logic — unlimited assertion complexity
• Monitoring-as-code with CLI, Terraform provider, and GitHub Action
• 20+ global check locations with configurable parallelism
• Multistep API checks that chain requests with shared state between steps
• Retry logic configurable per-check to reduce false positives
• Private locations for internal API monitoring behind firewalls
• Alert channels include PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Slack, email, and custom webhooks

Pricing

Overage charges: $1.80 per additional 10,000 API check runs.

Cost traps

• Check runs are consumed even when checks pass — a 1-minute check across 3 locations burns 3 runs per minute (129,600/month for a single monitor)
• Multistep checks are Team-only ($64/mo) — no multi-step on Hobby or Starter
• Overage billing can surprise you: exceeding 100,000 runs on Team costs $1.80/10k, which adds up fast with frequent checks from multiple locations
• Browser checks (Playwright-based) have separate, more expensive pricing at $2.50/1k runs

Limitations

• Code-based checks have a steeper learning curve than point-and-click tools — non-developers can't easily create or modify checks
• No built-in status page — you need a separate tool or integration for public incident communication
• The free tier (10 monitors, 10,000 runs) is tight for anything beyond a hobby project

Best for: Engineering teams comfortable with TypeScript who want monitoring-as-code, CI/CD-integrated API checks, and the flexibility to write arbitrarily complex assertions.

Better Stack

Better Stack bundles uptime monitoring, incident management, on-call scheduling, status pages, and log management into a single platform. For API monitoring, Better Stack offers HTTP checks with keyword matching, multi-step checks that chain requests and pass data between steps, and response time tracking across multiple global locations.

The multi-step API check capability lets you build workflows: authenticate against an OAuth endpoint, extract the access token, call a protected resource, validate the response body, and verify response times — all in a single check definition. This covers the same ground as Checkly's multistep checks but without writing TypeScript. You configure steps through the dashboard UI, which is more accessible for teams where not everyone writes code but less flexible for complex assertion logic.

Better Stack's per-seat pricing model is the key consideration. Every user who needs to manage monitors, respond to incidents, or access dashboards is a "responder" at $29/mo (annual). For a 5-person team, that's $145/mo before adding extra monitors. Solo developers and two-person teams get significant value from the all-in-one approach; larger teams should calculate the total cost carefully.

Key strengths

• Multi-step API checks with variable passing between steps, available on paid tiers
• All-in-one platform: monitoring + status pages + incident management + on-call + logs
• HTTP checks with request body, custom headers, and keyword assertions
• On-call scheduling built in — no separate PagerDuty subscription needed
• Terraform provider for infrastructure-as-code workflows
• Log management in the same platform (search, alerting, dashboards)
• Incident timeline with integrated communication tools

Pricing

Cost traps

• Per-seat pricing multiplies with team size — a 10-person on-call rotation costs $290/mo in responder fees alone, before monitor add-ons
• Monitor add-on packs ($21/50 monitors) add up when you're monitoring hundreds of API endpoints
• The free tier's 3-minute interval may be too slow for API monitoring where you want to catch failures within seconds
• Log management is a separate product with its own pricing — the "all-in-one" label has limits

Limitations

• Response body validation is keyword-based, not JSON path — you can check if a string appears in the response, but you can't assert that data.user.role equals "admin"
• No code-based checks — complex assertion logic that goes beyond keyword matching requires workarounds
• Multi-step checks don't support the same assertion depth as Checkly's TypeScript scripts or Datadog's JSON path assertions

Best for: Teams that want monitoring, incident management, on-call, and status pages in a single platform, with solid API monitoring and the willingness to pay per-seat.

UptimeRobot

UptimeRobot is the monitoring tool most developers try first. Its free tier — 50 monitors with 5-minute intervals — is generous enough for personal projects and early-stage products. Setup takes two minutes: enter a URL, pick HTTP, and you're monitoring.

For API monitoring, UptimeRobot is limited. Paid plans support custom headers and request bodies (POST, PUT), which covers basic API endpoint checks. But validation stops at HTTP status codes and keyword matching — you can check if the response contains a specific string, but you can't validate JSON paths, assert on header values, or run multi-step API workflows. There's no request chaining, no environment variables, and no way to test authentication flows end-to-end.

The critical caveat: UptimeRobot's free tier is restricted to non-commercial use. If you're monitoring a commercial product, SaaS, or any revenue-generating service on the free plan, you're violating the terms of service. The Solo plan at $9/mo is the entry point for commercial monitoring, but it drops to just 10 monitors — a significant downgrade from the free tier's 50.

Key strengths

• Dead-simple setup — URL in, monitoring out, no configuration learning curve
• Generous free tier for personal and non-commercial projects (50 monitors, 5-min)
• Custom headers and request bodies on paid plans for basic API checks
• 13 monitoring locations worldwide
• Status pages included on paid plans
• Mobile app with push notifications for on-the-go alerting
• Maintenance windows to suppress false alerts during planned deployments

Pricing

Cost traps

• Free tier is non-commercial only — using it for a business product violates ToS and risks account termination
• Solo tier drops to 10 monitors (from 50 on Free) — you pay $9/mo and lose 80% of your monitors
• Custom request headers and POST body support require paid plans — the free tier is GET-only
• SMS alerts consume credits that deplete and require top-ups on all tiers
• SSL monitoring is a separate check type that counts against your monitor limit

Limitations

• No JSON path or regex response body validation — keyword matching only
• No multi-step API checks, request chaining, or variable extraction
• No environment variables, no CI/CD integration, no config-as-code

Best for: Developers who need simple HTTP endpoint monitoring with status codes and keyword checks, and don't need response body validation or multi-step workflows.

Datadog Synthetic Monitoring

Datadog Synthetic Monitoring is the API monitoring offering from Datadog's broader observability platform. It provides API tests, multistep API tests, and browser tests (Playwright-based), all integrated with Datadog's APM, infrastructure monitoring, and log management.

For API monitoring specifically, Datadog's multistep API tests are the most capable option on this list. You can chain HTTP requests, gRPC calls, SSL checks, DNS lookups, and WebSocket connections in a single test. Each step supports JSON path assertions, regex matching, header validation, response time thresholds, and variable extraction. The extracted variables carry forward to subsequent steps, enabling complex authentication flows, CRUD lifecycle tests, and end-to-end API workflow validation.

The integration with APM is Datadog's unique advantage. When an API check fails, you can trace the failure from the synthetic test through the APM flame graph to the specific function or database query that caused the slowdown or error. No other tool on this list offers that level of correlation out of the box. If you're already running Datadog for infrastructure and APM, adding synthetic API monitoring is a natural extension.

The trade-off is cost. Datadog's synthetic monitoring doesn't exist in isolation — it requires a Datadog subscription, and the pricing is consumption-based with multiple dimensions that make total cost hard to predict upfront.

Key strengths

• Multistep API tests with JSON path assertions, regex, header validation, and variable extraction
• 100+ global check locations — the largest probe network on this list
• APM correlation: trace a synthetic failure to the exact backend function or query
• gRPC, WebSocket, SSL, DNS, and ICMP test types alongside HTTP
• CI/CD integration via Terraform provider, API, and datadog-ci CLI
• Private locations for monitoring internal APIs behind VPNs and firewalls
• Granular alerting with anomaly detection and composite monitors

Pricing

Cost traps

• Synthetic monitoring requires a Datadog subscription — you can't use it standalone; Infrastructure monitoring ($15/host/mo minimum) is the entry point
• Running a multistep test from 5 locations counts as 5 runs — location multiplier catches teams off guard
• APM correlation (the killer feature) requires APM at $31/host/mo on top of infrastructure monitoring
• No free tier for synthetic monitoring — the cheapest entry is annual commitment pricing
• On-demand pricing is 44% more expensive than annual commitments
• Custom metrics generated by synthetic tests may trigger additional charges on the metrics bill

Limitations

• Pricing complexity makes cost prediction difficult — total cost depends on run volume, locations, infrastructure hosts, and APM hosts
• Overkill for teams that just need API endpoint monitoring without full-stack observability
• Setup complexity is significantly higher than purpose-built monitoring tools — you're configuring within a massive platform

Best for: Enterprise teams already invested in the Datadog ecosystem who want API monitoring correlated with APM traces, infrastructure metrics, and logs in a single platform.

Postman Monitors

Postman Monitors turn your existing Postman collections into scheduled API checks. If your team already uses Postman for API development and testing, monitors let you reuse those collections — complete with pre-request scripts, test assertions, and environment variables — as production monitoring without rewriting anything.

The collection-based model is both Postman's strength and its constraint. Complex multi-step API workflows that you've already built as Postman collections — authentication, CRUD operations, data validation chains — work as monitors with zero migration. Test scripts written in JavaScript validate response bodies, headers, status codes, and response times with the same assertions your team already uses during development. Environment variables let you run the same collection against staging, production, and regional endpoints by swapping a single config.

The pricing model is per-user, which creates a multiplicative cost for larger teams. At $29/user/mo on Professional, a 10-person team pays $290/month — comparable to Datadog's synthetic monitoring but without APM correlation or infrastructure-wide observability. The monitoring call limits are the harder constraint: 50,000 monitoring calls per user per month on Professional sounds generous until you're running 20 collections at 15-minute intervals across multiple environments.

Key strengths

• Reuse existing Postman collections as monitors — zero rewrite for teams already on Postman
• JavaScript test scripts for response validation (JSON path, regex, custom assertion logic)
• Environment variables for multi-environment monitoring (dev, staging, production)
• Collection Runner for multi-step API workflows with shared variables between requests
• Integration with Postman's full API development workflow (design, mock, test, monitor)
• Webhook and Slack notifications on test failures
• Monitor results visible alongside API documentation and test history in one workspace

Pricing

Cost traps

• Per-user pricing — every team member who needs to create, edit, or view monitors adds to the monthly bill
• Monitoring calls are separate from Postman API calls for workspace collaboration — teams often confuse the two limits
• Running collections with many requests against multiple environments burns through monitoring calls quickly
• Free tier (1,000 monitoring calls) allows roughly 1 collection with 5 requests running every 6 hours for a month — barely useful for production monitoring
• No standalone monitoring purchase — you're buying Postman's full API platform whether you need it or not

Limitations

• Monitoring is tied to Postman's ecosystem — you can't use monitors without a Postman workspace and collections
• Monitor scheduling granularity is limited compared to purpose-built monitoring tools
• No status page integration — monitoring failures don't auto-update a public status page

Best for: Teams that already use Postman for API development and want to repurpose their test collections as production monitors without adopting a separate tool.

Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is an open-source, self-hosted monitoring tool that runs in a single Docker container. For API monitoring, it supports HTTP(S) checks with custom headers, status code validation, keyword matching in response bodies, and response time tracking. It's the tool you deploy when you want full control over your monitoring infrastructure and zero recurring costs.

The trade-off for self-hosting is feature scope. Uptime Kuma doesn't support response body JSON path validation, multi-step API checks, request chaining, environment variables, or config-as-code workflows. It's a single-request HTTP checker with keyword matching — effective for "is this endpoint up and returning the expected status code?" but insufficient for "does this endpoint return a valid JWT with the correct claims after authenticating with OAuth?"

What Uptime Kuma does exceptionally well is notifications. With 95+ notification integrations — Slack, Discord, Telegram, PagerDuty, Gotify, Ntfy, Matrix, Pushover, and dozens more — it's the most flexible notification system on this list by a wide margin. Custom check intervals can go as low as 20 seconds, which is more frequent than most paid tools' standard tiers.

Key strengths

• Completely free and open-source (MIT license) — no usage limits, no vendor lock-in, no terms to worry about
• 95+ notification integrations — the broadest notification support of any tool on this list
• Self-hosted: your monitoring data never leaves your infrastructure
• Custom check intervals as low as 20 seconds
• HTTP, TCP, DNS, Docker, Steam, MQTT, and additional monitor types beyond API checks
• Built-in status pages with custom styling and branding
• Active community with frequent updates (28k+ GitHub stars)

Pricing

Uptime Kuma is free. You pay for the infrastructure to run it — a $5/mo VPS, an existing Kubernetes cluster, or a Docker host you already have. There are no tiers, no per-monitor fees, no per-user charges, and no usage limits.

Cost traps

• Self-hosting costs: compute, storage, backups, and the engineering time to maintain the monitoring server itself
• No managed option — you're responsible for the uptime of your uptime monitor
• No SLA or support contract — if your monitoring server goes down at 3 AM, you debug it yourself
• Scaling to hundreds of monitors requires manual infrastructure sizing — more monitors mean more CPU, memory, and disk I/O

Limitations

• No response body JSON path validation — keyword matching only, no way to assert on specific fields in JSON responses
• No multi-step API checks, request chaining, or variable passing between requests
• No environment variables, no CI/CD integration, no Terraform provider, no config-as-code

Best for: Developers and small teams who want free, self-hosted HTTP monitoring with broad notification support and are comfortable managing their own infrastructure.

Decision framework

The right tool depends on what you're actually validating and how your team works. Here's how to narrow from seven options to one.

Start with what you need to validate. If you only need to know whether your API endpoints return 200 OK and respond within a time threshold, UptimeRobot (paid tier) or Uptime Kuma will do the job at the lowest cost. The moment you need to validate response bodies — specific JSON fields, header values, or multi-step authentication flows — the field narrows to DevHelm, Checkly, Datadog, or Postman.

Consider your workflow. Teams practicing infrastructure-as-code will gravitate toward DevHelm (CLI + Terraform), Checkly (TypeScript + Terraform), or Datadog (Terraform + API). Teams who want a dashboard-first experience with built-in on-call should look at Better Stack. Teams already deep in Postman's ecosystem should evaluate Postman Monitors before adopting yet another tool.

Calculate total cost at your actual scale, not starting price. A "free" tool that requires a $15/host Datadog subscription isn't free. A "$29/mo" per-seat tool costs $290/mo for a 10-person team. A "$0" tool with non-commercial restrictions isn't an option for your SaaS product. Run the numbers for your actual team size, monitor count, and check frequency before committing.

The real question

API monitoring tools have converged on the basics — HTTP checks, status code validation, response time tracking, and webhook alerting. Every tool on this list can tell you when an endpoint goes down. The differentiation happens at the validation layer most tools skip: asserting on what the API actually returns.

If your monitoring stack only checks HTTP status codes, you're catching crashes but missing the failures that actually hurt users — malformed responses, missing fields, expired tokens, and silently degraded data quality. The shift from "is it up?" to "is it correct?" is where API monitoring earns its keep. If you're still choosing a general-purpose website monitoring tool, start there first — but come back here once your API surface area grows beyond basic health checks.

Pick the tool that matches your validation depth and your team's workflow. If you need response body assertions without per-user pricing, try DevHelm's free tier — 50 monitors with full HTTP validation, no credit card required, no commercial use restrictions. If you need browser-level synthetic monitoring or deep APM correlation, look at Checkly or Datadog. If you need the simplest possible setup and your checks are status-code-only, UptimeRobot or Uptime Kuma will serve you well.

The worst choice is no API monitoring at all. A broken endpoint that returns 200 OK is worse than a crashed server — at least a crashed server triggers an alert. A silently broken API just sits there, returning empty bodies and malformed payloads, while your customers discover the problem for you.

Originally published on DevHelm.