Global Electronics Certification: FCC, CE, UKCA, PSE & More

Certify electronics from China for global markets — FCC, CE, UKCA, PSE, EAC, SASO & more. Which tests transfer, what runs in parallel, realistic timelines.

The standard advice for multi-market certification is sequential: FCC first, then CE, then UKCA, then Japan. Follow that advice and your 18-24 month timeline will be accurate — and entirely unnecessary.

Most certification guides cover one market at a time because they're written by labs that serve one market. The question hardware startups actually face — "I'm launching in the US and EU simultaneously, how do I structure this so I'm not waiting 12 months for FCC before I start CE?" — rarely gets a direct answer. This guide is that answer.

FCC and CE share significant underlying test infrastructure. A properly structured parallel program delivers FCC + CE + UKCA in 12-16 weeks, with Japan in 14-20 weeks. The efficiency comes from knowing which tests transfer between standards, which labs run multi-standard programs, and how to sequence factory builds around certification milestones.

1. What each market actually requires

The differences at the standard level tell you where you can share work and where you can't.

US — FCC

FCC authorization is required for any device with intentional or unintentional radio frequency emission sold in the US. For a wireless device — anything with BLE, WiFi, LoRa, Zigbee, or cellular — that means both Part 15B (unintentional emissions from the device chassis and power supply) and Part 15C or the relevant service part (intentional radiator, meaning the radio itself).

The two authorization paths are SDoC (Supplier's Declaration of Conformity) for certain low-risk unintentional radiators, and TCB (Telecommunications Certification Body) certification for most wireless devices. Consumer electronics with BLE or WiFi go through a TCB.

Core tests: radiated and conducted emissions (EMC), specific absorption rate (SAR) if the device is held against or near the body, and band-specific radio tests for each frequency band the device uses.

Timeline: 4-8 weeks at a TCB-recognized lab. Expedited review is available from most TCBs for an additional fee.
Cost: $2,000-8,000 depending on the number of radio bands and SAR testing requirements.

EU — CE (RED + EMC Directive + LVD)

CE marking is required for all electronics sold in EU member states. Wireless devices fall under the Radio Equipment Directive (RED, 2014/53/EU), which covers radio, EMC, and safety in a single directive. Non-radio electronics with mains voltage fall under the Low Voltage Directive (LVD). Most consumer electronics with BLE or WiFi are primarily RED devices.

Core tests: EMC to EN 55032 and EN 55035, safety to EN 62368-1 (audio/video equipment), and radio testing to the relevant ETSI standard for your frequency bands.

CE marking for wireless devices is self-declaration backed by test data from an EU-recognized lab. You compile a technical file — test reports, Declaration of Conformity, user manual — and make it available to market surveillance authorities on request. SGS, TÜV Rheinland, Intertek, and Bureau Veritas all run full-service EMC and RF labs in Shenzhen.

Timeline: 4-8 weeks. Cost: €1,500-6,000.

UK — UKCA

Post-Brexit, the UK runs its own conformity marking scheme. The technical requirements are currently identical to CE — the UK adopted EU standards wholesale and has not yet diverged on testing requirements for most product categories. UKCA differs from CE primarily in two administrative ways: you must use a UK Approved Body (not an EU Notified Body) for regulated products requiring third-party assessment, and you need a UK-based Responsible Person on record.

The practical implication is that most labs with EU credentials also have a UK Approved Body affiliate or partnership. The same test reports that support CE can be used for UKCA, with one additional administrative step: the UK Approved Body reviews the technical file and issues a separate UKCA certificate.

Timeline: adds 1-2 weeks to the CE process.
Cost: adds €500-1,000 to the CE cost.

Japan — PSE + TELEC/MIC

Japan has two distinct certification requirements that often get conflated.

PSE (Product Safety of Electrical Appliances and Materials) covers product safety for listed product categories. Requirements depend on category: some allow self-certification, others require third-party certification. The relevant standards are JIS-based and do not accept EN 62368-1 data directly.

TELEC/MIC is radio type approval under Japan's Radio Law. Any device with a radio transmitter requires MIC certification. Testing uses ARIB standards — Japan-specific, not interchangeable with FCC or ETSI test data. This is the critical distinction: US and EU test data overlaps substantially; Japan's does not.

Timeline: 8-16 weeks for combined TELEC + PSE. Often engaged simultaneously with the FCC/CE program but returns results later.
Cost: ¥300,000-800,000 (approximately $2,000-5,500) depending on product category and radio bands.

Canada — ISED + cULus

ISED (Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, formerly Industry Canada) governs radio. Any device with a transmitter needs ISED certification to the relevant RSS standard (for example RSS-247 for licence-exempt BLE/WiFi). The RF test data overlaps heavily with FCC, so most TCBs issue FCC and ISED together from one test campaign. Mains-powered products additionally need a Canadian NRTL safety mark — cUL, cCSA, or cETL (the "c" prefix denotes Canada). Bilingual English/French labelling and manuals are mandatory.

Timeline: usually concurrent with FCC, adds 1-2 weeks. Cost: adds $800-2,000 to the FCC program.

Mexico — NOM + IFT

Two tracks. NOM (Norma Oficial Mexicana) is mandatory safety/EMC certification issued by accredited bodies such as NYCE or ANCE; it generally requires testing in-country or witnessed testing plus a local importer of record. IFT (Instituto Federal de Telecomunicaciones) is radio homologation for any transmitter. Spanish-language labelling is required. NOM is usually the bottleneck.

Timeline: 6-10 weeks. Cost: $2,000-6,000.

Russia & the EAEU — EAC

The EAC (Eurasian Conformity) mark covers Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan under the EAEU technical regulations — TR CU 020/2011 (EMC), TR CU 004/2011 (low-voltage safety), and the EAEU RoHS analogue TR EAEU 037/2016. Any device with encryption (BLE and WiFi both count) additionally needs an FSB notification/FAC for the radio. EAC is issued as either a Declaration or a Certificate of Conformity depending on the product, always through an EAEU-registered body with a local applicant of record.

Timeline: 4-8 weeks. Cost: $1,500-5,000.

GCC & the Middle East — SASO/SABER + G-Mark

Saudi Arabia is the largest and strictest market: SASO standards are enforced through the SABER platform, where you first obtain a Product Certificate of Conformity (PCoC) and then a Shipment Certificate of Conformity (SCoC) for every consignment. The GCC G-Mark applies to low-voltage equipment and toys across the Gulf states. The UAE adds ECAS/EQM safety registration (MoIAT, formerly ESMA) and TDRA (formerly TRA) type approval for radio. Most of the region accepts IEC CB Scheme reports, so a CB Certificate accelerates every Gulf market at once.

Timeline: 3-6 weeks once CB reports exist. Cost: $1,500-5,000, plus per-shipment SABER fees.

Australia & New Zealand — RCM

The Regulatory Compliance Mark (RCM) is a single mark covering both EMC/radio (ACMA) and electrical safety, recognized in Australia and New Zealand. Radio uses AS/NZS standards that largely align with ETSI, so EU RED test data transfers well. Mains products need safety to AS/NZS 62368.1 and, for many appliance categories, MEPS energy-efficiency registration. You must appoint a local Responsible Supplier with an Australian or New Zealand address listed in the national database.

Timeline: 2-4 weeks on top of a CE program. Cost: $1,000-3,000.

Brazil & South America — ANATEL + INMETRO

Brazil is the gateway and the slowest: ANATEL homologation is mandatory for any radio device (BLE and WiFi included), requires testing at an ANATEL-accredited lab, and needs a local representative; INMETRO covers safety for listed categories. Argentina uses ENACOM for radio and an IRAM safety mark; Chile uses SUBTEL for telecom and SEC for electrical safety. These markets accept little foreign data directly — in-country or witnessed testing is common, which is what makes them slow.

Timeline: 8-16 weeks (ANATEL is the bottleneck). Cost: $3,000-8,000 per country.

Africa — SABS/NRCS, SONCAP, KEBS

Enforcement is mostly at import, through PVoC (Pre-Export Verification of Conformity) programs rather than a single regional mark. South Africa: ICASA type approval for radio, plus an NRCS Letter of Authority (LOA) and SABS marks for safety. Nigeria: a SONCAP certificate (SON) plus NCC type approval for radio. Kenya: KEBS PVoC. Many other markets — Tanzania, Egypt, Algeria, Ghana — run PVoC/CoC schemes administered by SGS, Intertek, or Bureau Veritas, so the same lab doing your CE/FCC work can usually issue the destination Certificate of Conformity from existing CB or CE reports.

Timeline: 1-3 weeks per shipment once base reports exist. Cost: $500-2,000 per market, often charged per shipment.

2. Which tests actually transfer between markets

This is where most certification guides stop being useful. They list what each market requires. They don't tell you what's actually shared.

EMC emissions — substantial overlap

EN 55032 (CE) and FCC Part 15 Subpart B both test conducted and radiated emissions from the same sources: power supply, switching regulators, clock oscillators, and digital bus activity. The methodology is similar enough that many labs run a single combined EMC session covering both standards.

The frequency ranges differ slightly — FCC Part 15B extends from 9 kHz, EN 55032 Class B from 30 MHz — so a combined run takes marginally longer than a single-market run. But it saves 2-4 weeks compared to two separate submissions and a sample transfer between labs.

Safety — harmonized at the standard level

EN 62368-1 (EU, audio/video and IT equipment) and UL 62368-1 (US) are harmonized standards — they share the same technical requirements, originating from the same IEC 62368-1 base standard. A test report generated to EN 62368-1 can be used to support UL certification with supplementary testing for US-specific requirements (primarily related to mains voltage differences and UL's own administrative requirements).

This is the most significant test transfer opportunity in multi-market certification. Safety testing is time-consuming — 4-6 weeks — and running EN 62368-1 and UL 62368-1 in sequence would mean 8-12 weeks of serial safety testing. Running them against the same base standard, with supplementary testing for each, takes 5-7 weeks.

Radio tests — standards diverge

FCC Part 15C and ETSI EN 300 328 (BLE/WiFi) use different frequency allocations, measurement bandwidths, and power limits. FCC test reports don't transfer to CE RED compliance — both tests must be run.

They can, however, be run on the same equipment at the same lab against the same samples. "Different standards" does not mean "different lab visits." A lab equipped for both FCC and ETSI radio testing runs both programs in overlapping time windows.

SAR/RF exposure — increasingly harmonized

FCC Part 2.1093 and the CE equivalent (IEC 62209-1528) are increasingly aligned. For many device types, SAR data generated to IEC 62209-1528 is accepted by both regulators with lab confirmation that it meets both sets of limits.

3. How to structure a parallel certification program

The efficiency of a parallel program depends on sequencing test submissions correctly and selecting a lab that can run the full scope. Here is how we structure it for a typical consumer electronics product with BLE and WiFi targeting US + EU + UK simultaneously.

Phase 1 — Pre-certification engineering review (Weeks 1-2)

Review the design before any lab submission. Changes after submission reset the clock. The review covers antenna placement against FCC and CE conducted power requirements, RF output power versus both FCC and ETSI limits (they differ — comply with the stricter for each band), schematic EMC best practices, which FCC parts apply, and which CE directives apply (RED for wireless, LVD if mains-powered).

At the end of Phase 1: confirmed test scope, lab selected (FCC + CE + UKCA capability), and production-representative samples ready — not engineering samples.

Phase 2 — Parallel testing (Weeks 3-8)

EMC testing (combined FCC Part 15B / EN 55032) runs in weeks 3-5 — the longest single block because it requires a full frequency sweep in multiple orientations.

Safety testing (EN 62368-1 / UL 62368-1) starts in week 3 and runs through week 6, in parallel with EMC because it uses separate equipment and personnel.

Radio type testing (FCC Part 15C and ETSI) starts in week 4, after an EMC pre-scan confirms the device won't fail emissions. Running radio testing before the pre-scan pass is a mistake: an EMC failure may require a board revision, which invalidates the radio test data.

Phase 3 — Documentation and application (Weeks 8-12)

FCC TCB application: submit test reports to the TCB. Grant issuance takes 2-4 weeks — the tests are done, you're waiting on the FCC ID assignment.

CE technical file: assemble the Declaration of Conformity, test reports, schematic, BOM, and user manual (in each target EU country's language). Allow 1-2 weeks. Common failures include DoC signed by someone outside the EU and wrong directive version cited (2014/53/EU, not the old R&TTE Directive).

UKCA: same technical file, reviewed by the UK Approved Body — adds 1 week.

Phase 4 — Japan (Weeks 12-20 if required)

Engage TELEC/PSE simultaneously with Phase 2, not after. Results arrive later because the Japanese process is slower administratively. If Japan is a launch market, engage a Japanese certification agent when you engage the FCC/CE lab — Japan becomes a parallel track. If Japan is a secondary market, defer to a separate program without affecting the US/EU timeline.

4. China-based labs for multi-standard programs

The most efficient way to run a parallel FCC + CE + UKCA program is to use a single lab in China with both FCC recognition and EU Notified Body status (or a partnership with an EU Notified Body).

The labs that can do this from Shenzhen and Guangzhou: SGS (full FCC and CE scope in Shenzhen, EU Notified Body for multiple directives), TÜV Rheinland (German notified body with Guangzhou and Shenzhen operations, FCC and CE/RED capable), Intertek (FCC and CE accredited, UK Approved Body for UKCA), and Bureau Veritas (EU Notified Body, FCC-recognized, full EMC/safety in Shenzhen).

When evaluating a lab, ask:

• FCC-recognized (A2LA or NVLAP accreditation)?
• EU Notified Body or partnered with one?
• UK Approved Body for UKCA?
• Can you issue FCC TCB grants and EU test reports from the same test run?

A lab that answers yes to all four runs the entire FCC + CE + UKCA program without sample transfers between facilities — which alone saves 2-3 weeks in courier time.

For Japan, a separate Japanese authorized test body is required regardless. The Japanese Radio Law mandates testing at a Japan-authorized facility.

5. The module shortcut

If your product uses a pre-certified wireless module — an nRF52840-based BLE module, an ESP32 module with existing FCC/CE grants — the radio portion of certification is already done. Your product only needs system-level testing: Part 15B unintentional emissions and CE EMC + safety.

The impact: a BLE + WiFi product without a pre-certified module runs 8-12 weeks and $4,000-8,000 for FCC, 6-10 weeks and €3,000-6,000 for CE RED. The same product with a pre-certified module: 4-6 weeks and $2,000-4,000 for FCC, 4-6 weeks and €1,500-3,000 for CE.

The tradeoff: you're locked into the module's form factor and supplier. For early-stage products, the timeline reduction typically outweighs the module cost premium over a discrete chipset. Above 10,000 units annually, run the cost comparison carefully.

6. Mistakes that kill timelines

Changing the antenna design after Phase 1. Antenna design changes require re-testing the radio type portion and potentially the SAR testing. A change discovered during production can reset 4-8 weeks of testing. The pre-certification engineering review exists to prevent this.

Testing with pre-production samples. Certification labs require production-representative samples — the same PCB layout, the same antenna, the same enclosure geometry as your final product. If you submit engineering samples and the production PCB has moved a component or changed a trace, you'll need to re-test. See our quality inspection process for how we verify that production samples match certified samples.

Selecting a lab that can run EMC but not radio testing. Many labs offer partial scopes — they can test Part 15B emissions but don't have a radio anechoic chamber for Part 15C. Splitting FCC between two labs means sample transfers, coordination overhead, and serial billing. Use a lab that can run the full FCC scope, or explicitly verify the split-lab arrangement before committing.

Incomplete CE technical file. CE is self-declaration — the responsibility for correctness is yours. Common failures: DoC signed by someone outside the EU (requires an EU-based responsible person), wrong directive version cited (2014/53/EU, not the old R&TTE Directive), or user manual missing the target EU country's language. German and Dutch market surveillance authorities check technical files thoroughly.

Starting Japan in Phase 3 instead of Phase 1. Japan certification takes longer not because of testing complexity but because of administrative processing time. Engage Japan in Phase 3 and it becomes an 8-16 week serial dependency after FCC/CE. Engage Japan in Phase 1 simultaneously and results arrive in weeks 12-20 — overlapping with, not following, your FCC/CE results.

7. Realistic multi-market timelines

For a wireless consumer electronics product (BLE + WiFi, no mains voltage, consumer electronics category) targeting US + EU + UK:

Adding Japan on a parallel track (engaged at Week 1):

Compare this to the sequential approach: FCC (8 weeks) → CE (8 weeks) → UKCA (2 weeks) → Japan (16 weeks) = 34 weeks minimum, assuming no failures. The parallel program delivers the same four markets in 16-20 weeks.

Structuring a multi-market certification program correctly at the start saves 4-8 weeks compared to discovering the sequencing mistakes mid-way. The common errors — changing the antenna after Phase 1, testing with non-representative samples, selecting a lab with incomplete scope — don't save time. They reset it.

For a concrete example of parallel FCC/CE certification on a wearable product, see how a US startup took a smartwatch through dual FCC/CE certification from sample to 3,000-unit production run. On the quality side, electronics quality control in China covers how to verify that production samples match certified configuration — a step that often gets skipped and invalidates the certification.

If you want to review your certification roadmap before engaging a lab, get in touch. We work with clients on pre-certification planning as part of sourcing and supplier matching, and we can recommend specific labs in Shenzhen based on your product category and target markets. You can also review the relevant factory audit process to understand how we verify that production samples will match your certified configuration.