Prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket) went mainstream in 2026. What most people miss is that the edge is real and measurable — but it's scattered, and the fees quietly kill the naive version of it.
I build trading systems, and I kept running into the same three problems. So I open-sourced two tools to solve them. This post is the math behind them.
Problem 1: "Free money" that isn't (fee-adjusted arbitrage)
A binary market has a YES and a NO contract. If they pay $1 on resolution, then in an efficient market:
YES_price + NO_price = $1.00
Sometimes they don't. If you can buy YES at $0.48 and NO at $0.49, that's $0.97 for a guaranteed $1.00 payout — a locked-in $0.03. Free money!
Except… fees. Kalshi's trading fee is roughly:
fee = ceil(0.07 * contracts * price * (1 - price)) # in cents
Run the numbers and a 3-cent gross "arbitrage" can become a loss after both legs' fees. The naive scanners that just check YES + NO < 1 will happily hand you negative-EV trades.
The fix is to compute everything fee-adjusted:
from edgehunt.arbitrage import single_market_arbitrage
op = single_market_arbitrage(market, fee_model=KalshiFeeModel())
print(op.fee_adjusted_profit)
Problem 2: the same event, two prices (cross-venue arbitrage)
The same event can trade at 47c YES on Kalshi and imply 51c on Polymarket. Buy YES on the cheaper venue, NO on the dearer one, and — fee-adjusted — you can lock a spread regardless of outcome. Doing this by hand across venues in real time is impossible; it's a scan-and-rank problem:
from edgehunt.scanner import Scanner
board = Scanner(feeds=[kalshi, polymarket]).scan()
Problem 3: you have an edge - how much do you bet? (EV + Kelly)
Your model says an outcome is 60% likely but the market prices it at 47c. Expected value (fee-adjusted) tells you if to bet; the Kelly criterion tells you how much so you grow long-run without going bust:
from edgehunt.ev import expected_value
from edgehunt.kelly import kelly_fraction, stake
ev = expected_value(price=0.47, edge_prob=0.60)
f = kelly_fraction(price=0.47, edge_prob=0.60)
size = stake(f * 0.5, bankroll=1000) # half-Kelly is safer
Half-Kelly is usually the sane default — full Kelly is mathematically optimal but brutally volatile.
Putting it together: edgehunt scan
edgehunt ties all of this into one command — a live terminal dashboard that ranks every opportunity, fee-adjusted, with Kelly sizing:
edgehunt :: ranked opportunities (bankroll $1,000)
# | Venue | Market | Type | Edge/EV | Fee-adj profit | Kelly stake
1 | kalshi/polymarket | incumbent wins popular vote? | ARB (x-venue) | $0.131/pr | +15.1% | $500
2 | kalshi | BTC above $100k on Dec 31? | ARB (1-mkt) | $0.030/pr | +3.1% | $500
3 | kalshi | Fed cuts rates in March? | MISPRICE | +22.0pts | +60.6% | $164
It runs offline in 60 seconds with a built-in fake feed (no API keys); wire a real Kalshi/Polymarket feed with a tiny adapter. Pure Python, MIT, 85 tests.
git clone https://github.com/Viprasol-Tech/edgehunt
cd edgehunt && pip install -e .
edgehunt scan
Bonus: give your AI agent the same edge (marketsmith)
The obvious next step in 2026 was to expose this to AI agents over the Model Context Protocol. marketsmith is an MCP server with tools like search_markets, get_odds, find_arbitrage, compute_ev, and suggest_kelly — so you can ask Claude or Cursor to find a fee-adjusted arb and it actually can.
A note on honesty
These are analytics tools, not execution bots, and nothing here is financial advice. Backtests and scans are not guarantees — fees, slippage, and resolution risk are real. Start read-only and understand every number before risking capital.
Both are MIT and open source:
- edgehunt: https://github.com/Viprasol-Tech/edgehunt
- marketsmith: https://github.com/Viprasol-Tech/marketsmith
If the math or the tools help you find an edge, a star genuinely helps me prioritize what to build next. Built by Viprasol Tech.
