We need to write a 400-500 word Dev.to article for professionals about AI automation in AI-assisted grant writing for nonprofits. Must be between 400-500 words, inclusive. Title: engaging, include "ai" or the topic. Must have intro (2-3 sentences max). Core: explain ONE key principle or framework clearly. Include 1 specific tool name and its purpose (from facts). Mini-scenario: 2 sentences showing principle in action. Implementation: 3 high-level steps (not exact prompts). Conclusion: summarize key takeaways only (no e-book promotion, URLs, discount codes). Tone: professional, conversational, helpful, authoritative. Output: Markdown with # title, ## subheadings, paragraphs. No placeholders. No thinking process. Output only article content.
We need to count words. Let's craft about 440 words.
We need to include facts from e-book: "Avoid jargon and acronyms." "Make the first sentence a compelling hook that states the human impact." "Use active voice." "Write in a tone that is hopeful but urgent." Brainstorming alternatives: "Give me five different ways to phrase this outcome goal." Edit with a scalpel, not a blanket: never accept full paragraph verbatim. Example: Instead of prompting "Write our project description for a youth literacy grant," use a layered approach: Overcoming writer's block: "I've described our approach; now write a compelling opening sentence for the 'Project Description' section." Simplifying jargon: "Rewrite this technical paragraph for a lay audience." Treat every AI-generated fact as a first draft. Implement a three-step verification for any claim: Could this information, if exposed, harm a client, donor, or our organization? Does this describe a unique, non-public program detail or strategy? Does this input contain any names, addresses, IDs, or specific dates? (Adapted from sector-wide best practices) "I lead with strategy and story. AI assists with structure and syntax. I verify every fact. I protect every piece of data. I own the final voice." The Fix: Curate and Command Your Voice; The Fix: Establish a Basic AI Governance Checklist for Grant Writing; The Fix: Implement a Strict AI Data Governance Protocol; The Fix: Integrate AI into a Cohesive, Phased Workflow; The Fix: Mandatory Verification Protocol.
We need to include one specific tool name and its purpose (from facts). The facts didn't mention a specific tool name, but we can choose something like "Grammarly" or "Hemingway Editor"? However, requirement: "Include 1 specific tool name and its purpose (from facts)". Since facts didn't list a specific tool, we need to infer from facts? The facts mention "Brainstorming alternatives: 'Give me five different ways to phrase this outcome goal.'" That's a prompt, not a tool. Could mention "ChatGPT" as the AI tool. Provide its purpose: generating draft language. That is okay.
We need to explain ONE key principle or framework clearly. Perhaps the principle: "Layered, iterative AI-assisted drafting with verification" or "Curate and Command Your Voice". Choose one principle: "Curate and Command Your Voice" (lead with strategy and story, AI assists with structure and syntax, verify facts, protect data, own final voice). That's a principle.
We need to include mini-scenario: 2 sentences showing principle in action.
Implementation: 3 high-level steps (not exact prompts). Provide steps like: 1) Define core strategy and impact hook manually; 2) Use AI for drafting sections with layered prompts; 3) Apply verification checklist and governance before submission.
Conclusion: summarize key takeaways only.
We must not include any e-book promotion, URLs, discount codes.
Word count: Let's draft about 440 words.
We'll need to count words precisely. Let's write then count.
Draft:
Nonprofits often stare at blank grant sections, wrestling with tight deadlines and the pressure to convey impact convincingly. AI can speed up drafting, but left unchecked it risks producing generic, jargon‑laden prose that misses the funder’s heart.
The Principle: Curate and Command Your Voice
Treat AI as a junior writer who handles structure and syntax while you retain strategic control. Begin with a human‑crafted hook that states the real‑world impact, then let AI suggest alternatives, simplify language, and fill in sections. Every AI‑generated sentence is a first draft; you verify facts, protect sensitive data, and polish the final voice to ensure it is hopeful, urgent, and active.
Mini‑Scenario
A program manager writes the hook: “Last year, 150 children gained reading confidence after our summer literacy camp.” She then asks the AI for five ways to phrase the outcome goal, picks the clearest, and rewrites the technical paragraph for a lay audience using active voice.
Implementation Steps
- Set the human foundation – Manually write the impact hook and outline core strategy before invoking any AI tool.
- Layered AI assistance – Use prompts that ask for specific tasks such as brainstorming alternatives, simplifying jargon, or drafting a single section, never requesting full paragraphs verbatim.
- Verify and govern – Apply a three‑fact check (risk of exposure, uniqueness, personal data) and run the text through a style guide that enforces active voice, hopeful‑urgent tone, and acronym‑free language before final submission.
Conclusion
By leading with strategy and story, using AI only for structure and syntax, and rigorously verifying every claim, nonprofits produce grant narratives that are both compelling and trustworthy. This disciplined approach turns AI from a shortcut into a reliable co‑author that amplifies, rather than dilutes, your organization’s voice.
Now count words.
Let's count manually.
Title line: "AI-Assisted Grant Writing: Curate and Command Your Voice"
Words: AI-Assisted(1) Grant(2) Writing:(3) Curate(4) and(5) Command(6) Your(7) Voice(8) => 8 words.
Blank line? Not counted.
Intro paragraph: "Nonprofits often stare at blank grant sections, wrestling with tight deadlines and the pressure to convey impact convincingly. AI can speed up drafting, but left unchecked it risks producing generic, jargon‑laden prose that misses the funder’s heart."
Count:
Nonprofits1 often2 stare3 at4 blank5 grant6 sections,7 wrestling8 with9 tight10 deadlines11 and12 the13 pressure14 to15 convey16 impact17 convincingly.18 AI19 can20 speed21 up22 drafting,23 but24 left25 unchecked26 it27 risks28 producing29 generic,30 jargon‑laden31 prose32 that33 misses34 the35 funder’s36 heart37.
=> 37 words.
Now heading: "## The Principle: Curate and Command Your Voice"
Words: The1 Principle:2 Curate3 and4 Command5 Your6 Voice7 => 7 words.
Paragraph under principle: "Treat AI as a junior writer who handles structure and syntax while you retain strategic control. Begin with a human‑crafted hook that states the real‑world impact, then let AI suggest alternatives, simplify language, and fill in sections. Every AI‑generated sentence is a first draft; you verify facts, protect sensitive data, and polish the final voice to ensure it is hopeful, urgent, and active."
Count:
Treat1 AI2 as3 a4 junior5 writer6 who7 handles8 structure9 and10 syntax11 while12 you13 retain14 strategic15 control.16 Begin17 with18 a19 human‑crafted20 hook21 that22 states23 the24 real‑world25 impact,26 then27 let28 AI29 suggest30 alternatives,31 simplify32 language,33 and34 fill35 in36 sections.37 Every38 AI‑generated39 sentence40 is41 a42 first43 draft;44 you45 verify46 facts,47 protect48 sensitive49 data,50 and51 polish52 the53 final54 voice55 to56 ensure57 it58 is59 hopeful,60 urgent,61 and62 active63.
=> 63 words.
Mini-scenario heading: "## Mini‑Scenario"
Words: Mini‑Scenario1 => 1? Actually "Mini‑Scenario" counts as one word. So 1.
Paragraph: "A program manager writes the hook: “Last year, 150 children gained reading confidence after our summer literacy camp.” She then asks the AI for five ways to phrase the outcome goal, picks the clearest, and rewrites the technical paragraph for a lay audience using active voice."
Count:
A1 program2 manager3 writes4 the5 hook:6 “Last7 year,8 1509 children10 gained11 reading12 confidence13 after14 our15 summer16 literacy17 camp.”18 She19 then20 asks21 the22 AI23 for24 five25 ways26 to27 phrase28 the29 outcome30 goal,31 picks32 the33 clearest,34 and35 rewrites36 the37 technical38 paragraph39 for40 a41 lay42 audience43 using44 active45 voice46.
=> 46 words.
Implementation heading: "## Implementation Steps"
Words: Implementation1 Steps2 => 2.
Paragraph list: We have three steps, each as a sentence.
"1. Set the human foundation – Manually write the impact hook and outline core strategy before invoking any AI tool."
Count:
- Set1 the2 human3 foundation4 –5 Manually6 write7 the8 impact9 hook10 and11 outline12 core13 strategy14 before15 invoking16 any17 AI18 tool19.
=> 19 words.
"2. Layered AI assistance – Use prompts that ask for specific tasks such as brainstorming alternatives, simplifying jargon, or drafting a single section, never requesting full paragraphs verbatim."
Count:
- Layered1 AI2 assistance3 –4 Use5 prompts6 that7 ask8 for9 specific10 tasks11 such12 as13 brainstorming14 alternatives,15 simplifying16 jargon,17 or18 drafting19 a20 single21 section,22 never23 requesting24 full25 paragraphs26 verbatim27.
=> 27 words.
"3. Verify and govern – Apply a three‑fact check (risk of exposure, uniqueness, personal data) and run the text through a style guide that enforces active voice, hopeful‑urgent tone, and acronym‑free language before final submission."
Count:
- Verify1 and2 govern3 –4 Apply5
