The Real Problem with Most GEO Audits
Your website might be cited in ChatGPT. Or it might not be. Or it might be cited only in specific regions, at specific times, for specific query types. The honest truth: most teams have no idea.
Existing audit tools promise visibility into AI engine coverage. They run queries, scan for citations, generate a report. Then they move on. What they miss—almost entirely—is the structural reason why your site gets cited or ignored. They see the symptom but not the disease.
This matters because the fix for "not cited enough" depends entirely on which signal is broken. Is it authority? Recency? Topical relevance? Query intent match? Format accessibility? Each requires a different remediation approach. Without that diagnosis, you're optimizing blind.
What a Real GEO Audit Actually Measures
A framework-driven audit separates signal from noise. It tracks five categories of citation potential—and what vendors typically ignore:
1. Raw Citation Frequency (What Everyone Counts)
How many AI queries return your domain in the response? This is the easy number. It's also nearly useless in isolation. A 2% citation rate might be healthy for a niche B2B SaaS tool and catastrophic for a consumer brand. Context collapses the metric.
2. Query Segment Performance (Where Most Audits Fail)
Citation rates fracture across query intent, geography, and model version. A travel guide might be cited 40% of the time for "best restaurants in Barcelona" but 8% of the time for "restaurant reservation systems." Vendors who lump these together make you optimize for the wrong query shape.
3. Authority Recognition (The Hidden Layer)
If an AI engine doesn't recognize your domain as an authority source, no amount of content optimization will fix your citation rate. You're fighting upstream.
Some domains are pre-weighted as trusted sources in AI training data. Others earn that weight over months. A proper audit reveals where you sit on that spectrum and what domains in your category score higher. Then it reverse-engineers what content, backlink profiles, or claims those domains own that you don't.
4. Content Accessibility (Where Format Matters)
AI engines parse HTML differently. Some models prioritize structured data (schema). Others favor dense prose. Some pull from image captions or FAQ sections. An audit that doesn't map your content's actual machine readability against engine capabilities is guessing. You might have great content that's simply formatted wrong for the models that matter.
5. Recency Bias and Crawl Lag (The Time Variable)
Claude might see your site weekly. ChatGPT's training data might be six months stale. Perplexity crawls live. An audit that doesn't account for these crawl cadences and data freshness windows will tell you your site "should" be cited when the engine literally doesn't know about your latest content yet.
How Citation Gaps Tell You What's Broken
Once you have clean signal across those five dimensions, gaps become diagnostic:
High authority, low citation? Your content format or on-page structure probably doesn't align with what AI training processes captured. Fix: restructure key pages with schema and clearer hierarchies.
High citation in old queries, low in new ones? Recency lag or crawl access. Fix: ensure proper indexing signals and consider publishing higher-velocity content.
Cited in one engine, invisible in others? Different training data or crawl access across models. Fix: audit each engine's known source preferences and backfill gaps.
Low citation despite strong authority? Query intent mismatch—you own the topic but not the specific question types users ask. Fix: topic expansion or reformatting existing content around high-volume intent variants.
How Modulus Approaches This
We treat GEO audits as a forensic process, not a checkbox. We don't just count citations—we map the five signal layers, isolate which ones are underperforming, and reverse-engineer the competitive content and authority patterns that high-cited domains own. Then we build a remediation roadmap tied to actual lever you can pull.
The audit itself generates a prioritized list: which content gaps matter most, which authority signals to build, which format or structure changes move the needle fastest. You get a diagnosis before the treatment plan.
If you're ready to stop guessing which AI engines see your site and why, our Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) framework gives you the framework and the roadmap in one pass.
Read next from Modulus1:
Originally published on the Modulus1 insights blog. Browse more analysis on AI, SEO, and automation.
