Best Free App Blockers for Android (2026)

You install a screen time app on a Tuesday, full of resolve. By Thursday you've found the off switch, and by the weekend you've uninstalled it because the free tier turned out to block exactly two apps before asking for $40 a year. Sound familiar?

That's the real problem with most "free" app blockers for Android. The word free is doing heavy lifting. So this is a list of the best free app blockers for Android in 2026 where free actually means free, with the catches spelled out for the ones that aren't. I built one of these tools, so I'll be upfront about that and try to be fair to everyone else.

The short answer: best free Android app blockers in 2026 at a glance

If you just want the picks:

• Most feature-complete free + private: Nudge. Open source, no subscription, no internet permission, ADHD-focused friction features.
• Cleanest free option for plain blocking: ScreenZen. Good pause feature and per-app daily limits, but no in-feed blocking.
• The other open-source pick: DigiPaws. Promising, also does in-feed Shorts/Reels blocking, but still alpha and no breathing-pause feature yet.
• Already on your phone: Google Digital Wellbeing. Fine for awareness, weak at actual enforcement.
• Freemium tools worth knowing: AppBlock, Freedom, one sec, Opal. Capable, but the part you want is usually behind a paywall.

The rest of this is how I tested, what actually separates these, and where each one falls down.

How we tested (real devices, what "free" really means)

I ran each app on a Pixel 6 (Android 14) and a Samsung A54 (Android 13) for at least a few days each, doing normal stuff. Open Instagram out of habit, hit the block, see what happens. The questions I cared about:

• Does the free version actually block apps, or just count your minutes?
• Can you bypass it in three taps when you're weak?
• Does it need an internet connection or an account?
• Is there a hidden paywall on the feature that made you install it?

"Free" here means you can do the core job (block or slow down a distracting app) without paying, without a trial clock, and without a "pro" wall on the one setting you need. A tool that blocks one app free and charges for the second one is freemium, not free. I'll say which is which.

What to look for: free vs freemium, privacy, bypass-resistance, ADHD design

Four things separate a tool you'll still use in a month from one you'll delete:

Free vs freemium. Read the Play Store screenshots for the word "Pro" or a price. If the feature you want is gated, budget for it or move on.

Privacy. App blockers see everything you open. Some send that to a server. Check the permissions. An app blocker doesn't need your contacts, and it doesn't need internet at all.

Bypass-resistance. The whole point is stopping you in a weak moment. If the off switch is one tap on the block screen, it won't survive a real craving. Good friction makes quitting annoying without making the app a prison.

ADHD design. If you have ADHD, willpower-based tools fail you specifically. What works is friction at the moment of impulse, a pause that interrupts the autopilot reach for the phone. More on that below.

Three things worth knowing before you pick

Before the tool-by-tool breakdown, three decisions shape which app is right for you. Read these first and the picks below will make more sense.

If your goal is Shorts and Reels specifically, only two tools here do it. Most blockers force you to nuke the whole app. Only in-feed blocking can strip out Shorts or Reels while leaving DMs and search alone. On this list that's Nudge and DigiPaws. DigiPaws is still alpha-stage and skips the breathing pause, while Nudge pairs feed blocking with the delay-to-open pause and per-app budgets, covered in section 1.

If you have ADHD, friction beats willpower. The standard advice to "just use less screen time" is borderline insulting, because the entire issue is that the impulse fires before the deciding part of your brain gets a vote. Willpower-based tools assume you'll see a reminder and choose to stop. ADHD brains often don't get that window. A breathing pause inserts a physical delay between the reach for the phone and the dopamine hit. It's not asking you to be disciplined, it's making the autopilot loop slightly harder to complete, which is often enough to break it. That's the design principle behind delay-to-open and grayscale: change the environment, not the willpower. I wrote more about building an ADHD-friendly app blocker setup on Android for free if this is your situation.

Every app blocker needs the Accessibility permission, so the real question is what it does with it. To detect which app you're opening, all of them use the Accessibility API. That's a powerful permission. It can read what's on your screen. You're trusting whatever app you grant it to. So the privacy question isn't "does it ask for Accessibility," because they all need it. It's "what does it do with that access, and can you check?" An app with no internet permission physically can't send your screen data anywhere. An open-source app lets you read the code and confirm it. With closed-source freemium apps, you're trusting the privacy policy and the company's incentives. Sometimes that's fine. Just know which trust you're extending. There's a longer breakdown of open-source app blockers with no internet permission if you want to go deeper on the threat model.

1. Nudge: best free + open-source + privacy-first (delay-to-open)

Full disclosure: this is the one I built. Nudge is a free, open-source Android app blocker (v1.5.6 at the time of writing), built in Kotlin and Jetpack Compose. Android only. No iOS version, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise.

What it does:

• Delay-to-open. When you tap a distracting app, Nudge shows a short breathing pause first. That gap is enough to ask yourself if you actually meant to open TikTok or your thumb just did it.
• Per-app daily time budgets. Give Instagram 20 minutes a day. When it's gone, it's gone.
• App groups and schedules. Block a whole cluster of apps during work hours or after 11pm.
• In-app feature blocking. Kill YouTube Shorts, Instagram Reels, or the TikTok feed without blocking the entire app. You keep DMs and search, you lose the endless scroll.
• Grayscale mode. Drains the color out of your screen so the dopamine slot machine stops looking fun.

Here's the part that matters most to me: Nudge has zero internet permission. None. The app literally can't phone home because the capability isn't in the manifest, and because it's open source you can verify that yourself instead of trusting my word. All your data stays on the device. No account, no ads, no tracking, no "pro" tier. Everything's free because there's nothing to upsell.

Where it's weak: it's Android-only, and there's no one-tap store install today. The Play Store listing is pending review and the F-Droid listing is in progress, so for now you either build it from source or sideload the APK from GitHub. If you want a polished one-tap-from-the-store experience, that's a fair reason to wait.

How Nudge blocks YouTube Shorts and Reels without nuking the app

This is the request I hear most. You don't hate YouTube, you hate Shorts. You want to message friends on Instagram without the Reels tab sucking 40 minutes out of your evening. Most app-level blockers force you to block the whole app, which means you lose the useful part to kill the bad part.

The fix is in-feed blocking, where the tool detects the Shorts or Reels surface specifically and blocks just that, leaving the rest alone. Nudge does this. There's a step-by-step guide to blocking Shorts and Reels without blocking the app if you want the exact setup.

2. ScreenZen: solid free option, but no in-feed blocking

ScreenZen is a genuinely good free app and probably the closest thing to a direct comparison. It's fully free with no premium tier. Its core idea is the same pause-before-open friction, and it does that well. You set which apps trigger a breathing screen, and it nudges you to confirm you meant to open them. It also has per-app daily limits, so credit where it's due, that's not a gap.

Where it stops short for me: there's no in-feed blocking, so you can't strip out Reels while keeping the rest of Instagram. It's an app-level tool. If all you want is a pause screen with daily limits, ScreenZen is a clean, no-nonsense choice and I'd recommend it without hesitation. If you specifically need to block the Reels or Shorts feed while keeping the rest of the app, you'll hit its ceiling.

3. DigiPaws: the other open-source pick (alpha-stage, no delay-to-open)

DigiPaws is the other open-source app blocker worth knowing about, and the open-source corner of this category is thin, so it's worth your attention. It's privacy-respecting and actively developed. It also has an in-app blocker that strips out YouTube Shorts and Instagram Reels while leaving the rest of the app usable, which makes it the only other tool here besides Nudge that does feed-level blocking.

The catch is maturity. Last I checked it's still alpha-stage, which means rough edges and features in flux. It also doesn't have the breathing delay-to-open pause that Nudge and ScreenZen lean on. If you specifically want open source and you're comfortable with alpha software and reporting bugs, DigiPaws is a legitimate option and the project deserves support. If you want something more settled, it's early days.

4. Google Digital Wellbeing: built in, but no real enforcement

It's already on most Android phones, it's free, and it costs you nothing to set up. Digital Wellbeing shows you your screen time, lets you set app timers, and has a Focus Mode and a bedtime/grayscale schedule. For pure awareness, it's fine.

The problem is enforcement. App timers are trivially easy to dismiss with an "ignore for today" tap, and there's no real friction, no breathing pause, no bypass resistance. It's designed to inform, not to stop you. If you have the self-control for a gentle reminder to work, you might not need anything else. If gentle reminders were enough, you probably wouldn't be reading this.

5. Freemium options to know (AppBlock, Freedom, one sec, Opal) and their catch

These are well-known and several are good products. But they're freemium, and the gate usually sits on the feature you actually came for.

• AppBlock has a usable free tier, but stricter blocking, multiple profiles, and the harder-to-bypass modes push you toward the paid version.
• Freedom is cross-platform and polished, but the free plan caps you at a handful of blocking sessions before it asks for a subscription.
• one sec is built around the same pause-before-open idea Nudge and ScreenZen use, and it does it nicely, but the free version limits how many apps you can guard before going premium. (If that limit is your blocker, here's a free Android alternative to one sec.)
• Opal is heavily marketed and slick, but the meaningful enforcement and deep-focus features are paid. (Same story, here's an Opal alternative for Android that's free.)

None of these are scams. They're businesses, and the subscription funds the polish. The question is just whether you want to pay a recurring fee to stop yourself opening Instagram, or whether free does the job.

Comparison table: price, platform, open source, internet permission, key feature

Platform and pricing details for the freemium tools change, so check their current listings. The free/open-source/internet-permission columns are the ones that don't quietly shift on you.

Which free Android app blocker should you pick?

• You want maximum features, free, and verifiable privacy: Nudge. Android only, and for now you build from source or sideload the APK while the F-Droid and Play Store listings are in progress.
• You want a clean pause screen and nothing fancy: ScreenZen.
• You want open source and don't mind alpha software: DigiPaws.
• You want zero install effort and just need awareness: Digital Wellbeing, already on your phone.
• You don't mind paying for polish: any of the freemium options, just confirm the feature you want is in their plan.

There's no single right answer. The honest version is that the best free app blocker is the one you'll still have installed next month, which usually means the one that's annoying enough to work but not so annoying you rage-uninstall it.

FAQ

What's the best free app blocker for Android?
For genuinely free with no subscription and no paywalled features, Nudge and ScreenZen are the strongest picks. Both have a pause screen and per-app daily limits. Nudge adds in-feed Shorts/Reels blocking and verifiable, no-internet-permission privacy. ScreenZen is simpler and runs on more platforms.

Are any open source?
Yes. Nudge and DigiPaws are both open source. That means you can read the code and confirm what the app actually does instead of trusting a privacy policy. DigiPaws is earlier-stage; Nudge is at v1.5.6.

Is no-subscription real, or is there always a catch?
With most "free" app blockers, the catch is a paywall on the feature you need. With Nudge it's actually free with no pro tier, because it's open source and there's nothing to upsell. The honest tradeoff is that it's Android only and the Play Store listing is still in review.

Do app blockers need internet access?
They don't have to. Most do, for accounts and sync. Nudge ships with zero internet permission, so it can't send your data anywhere even in principle. That's the kind of thing worth checking in any app's permission list.

If you want the free, open-source, no-internet-permission option, Nudge is on GitHub. You can read the code, build it yourself, or sideload the APK. The F-Droid and Play Store listings are in progress. No account, no email, no catch. And if you've been deleting screen time apps for years because the free version never did the one thing you needed, that's exactly what this one is built to fix.