Can you compare dedicated versus shared node access for Solana RPC providers?

Shared Solana RPC access is usually the right starting point for development, staging, and many early production workloads. Dedicated node access is better when a team needs isolated resources, more predictable capacity, custom configuration, stronger control over traffic, or infrastructure support for high-volume Solana applications. OnFinality helps teams start with managed RPC access and evaluate dedicated infrastructure when shared access no longer fits.

Key Takeaways

Shared Solana RPC is usually best for development, staging, and early production apps.
Dedicated Solana node access is better for high-volume, latency-sensitive, or business-critical workloads.
The decision depends on traffic, isolation needs, monitoring, custom requirements, and budget.
Teams should start with measured usage and upgrade when shared access becomes a constraint.

Shared Solana RPC Is the Usual Starting Point

Shared Solana RPC access lets teams connect applications without operating their own Solana infrastructure. It is usually the fastest path for development, QA, staging, demos, wallets, dashboards, and early production usage.

The main benefits are speed, simplicity, and cost efficiency. A team can create an endpoint, test supported methods, monitor usage, and move quickly without hiring a dedicated infrastructure team.

Shared access works best when traffic is predictable, request volume fits plan limits, and the app does not need custom node configuration or isolated capacity.

Start with Solana RPC usage data

Use an authenticated endpoint and monitor real request patterns before choosing dedicated infrastructure.

View Solana RPC

Dedicated Access Fits Heavier Solana Workloads

Dedicated node access is about control and isolation. Instead of sharing infrastructure capacity with many users, a team can use infrastructure intended for its own workload requirements.

This becomes important when Solana traffic is high-volume, latency-sensitive, backend-critical, or tied to revenue. It may also matter when a team has custom configuration needs, stronger compliance expectations, or strict operational requirements.

Dedicated access is not automatically better for every team. It usually costs more and should be justified by measurable workload requirements.

Dedicated vs Shared Solana RPC

| Criterion | What to check | Why it matters |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cost | Shared RPC is usually more cost-efficient at lower usage; dedicated access costs more. | Teams should avoid paying for isolation before the workload needs it. |

| Isolation | Dedicated access gives stronger workload separation. | Isolation helps when traffic is business-critical or sensitive to resource contention. |

| Scaling | Shared plans have limits; dedicated infrastructure can be sized around the workload. | High-volume apps need a path beyond early-stage endpoint assumptions. |

| Operations | Dedicated access may need more planning, monitoring, and support coordination. | More control also means more operational responsibility. |

Compare cost and capacity

Review RPC plans and scaling paths before your Solana traffic reaches production peaks.

View RPC pricing

How to Decide

Use shared Solana RPC if you are building, testing, or running moderate production traffic.
Consider dedicated access if request volume regularly approaches plan limits.
Consider dedicated access if latency consistency directly affects user experience or revenue.
Consider dedicated access if your backend needs stronger isolation or custom configuration.
Use analytics and support conversations to decide based on evidence, not guesses.

Where OnFinality Fits

OnFinality gives teams a practical path to start with managed Solana RPC access and evaluate heavier infrastructure options as usage grows. That path is useful because many teams do not know their true RPC profile until staging or early production traffic exists.

A good approach is to start with shared RPC access, monitor usage, identify bottlenecks, and then decide whether dedicated node infrastructure is justified. This avoids premature complexity while keeping a scaling path open.

For Solana teams, the right answer is often not shared or dedicated forever. It is shared while the workload fits, then dedicated when traffic, isolation, or control requirements make the upgrade worthwhile.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is dedicated Solana RPC always better than shared RPC?

No. Dedicated Solana RPC is better for high-volume, latency-sensitive, or custom workloads, but shared RPC is often better for development, staging, and many early production apps.

When should I upgrade from shared Solana RPC to dedicated access?

Upgrade when traffic approaches plan limits, latency consistency becomes critical, custom configuration is needed, or your backend requires stronger workload isolation.