Hong Kong VATP: Crypto Regulation and TON in 2026

By mid-2026 Hong Kong has become one of the few Asian jurisdictions where crypto-assets are wired into the financial system through an explicit licensing framework rather than a grey zone or outright ban. The SFC’s VATP regime, HKMA’s stablecoin ordinance, spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs — all coexist within a single city under one common-law legal system.

For a Toncoin holder this is neither a haven nor a crypto-utopia. It is a working regulatory framework with a concrete entry cost, concrete retail limitations, and a sharp contrast against Singapore — which over the past five years has moved decisively in the opposite direction. This article is a navigator for anyone considering Hong Kong as a business or residency option, or simply trying to decode the headlines about “Hong Kong as a crypto hub”.

!

This is not legal advice. The Hong Kong framework is still maturing (the Stablecoins Ordinance only came into force in 2025; Type 9 asset-management clarifications are due in 2026). Before incorporating, applying for a provider engagement, or moving substantial funds, consult a licensed Hong Kong lawyer.

TL;DR

• The SFC introduced a mandatory VATP regime in June 2023 — every crypto exchange serving Hong Kong residents must be licensed under Type 1 + Type 7.
• HKMA introduced a parallel Stablecoins Ordinance (effective August 2025) — fiat-referenced stablecoin issuance requires a separate licence.
• In April 2024 the SFC approved spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs — making Hong Kong the second jurisdiction after the US with physical crypto ETFs for retail.
• Retail investors can only trade large-cap tokens and publicly approved ETFs; professional investors (HK$8M+ portfolio) have no such restrictions.
• Toncoin trades legally on several licensed VATPs; no Toncoin ETF exists yet, but the framework would allow one.

SFC, HKMA, and the regulatory architecture

To make sense of Hong Kong’s crypto framework you have to keep two regulators clearly separated in mind.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is an independent statutory regulator of securities markets, futures, and — since 2023 — virtual assets. SFC licenses exchanges, brokers, asset managers, and corporate finance providers. Anything “hot” — what counts as a security-token, who can sell crypto ETFs, which tokens can reach retail — is an SFC decision.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is the de facto central bank and the regulator of the banking system. HKMA runs monetary policy, maintains the HKD peg to USD through the Linked Exchange Rate System, and supervises banks. From 2025 it also licenses issuers of fiat-referenced stablecoins.

The split matters: SFC regulates trading and brokerage; HKMA regulates banking infrastructure and money-substitute issuance. A pure crypto exchange lives under SFC. A bank issuing an HKD-stablecoin reports to HKMA. A platform doing both needs both licences.

Unlike the EU, where MiCA is a single horizontal regulation covering everything crypto, Hong Kong’s model is vertical: each regulator writes rules in its own domain and they stitch together via inter-agency MoUs (the SFC-HKMA MoU of 2023, updated in 2025).

VATP licensing since 2023: what it provides and what it doesn’t

Before June 2023 Hong Kong ran an opt-in framework: a crypto exchange could voluntarily obtain an SFC licence if it wanted to deal in security-tokens, and could otherwise operate in a broader grey zone. That fork closed when the mandatory VATP regime came into force.

A VATP (Virtual Asset Trading Platform) is defined as any platform offering crypto-asset exchange services in Hong Kong or targeted at HK residents. Licensing is structured around two paired regimes:

• Type 1 — dealing in securities. The legacy regime, now covering tokens classified as security-tokens under SFC’s expanded interpretation. Capital adequacy, fit-and-proper requirements for directors, mandatory compliance officer.
• Type 7 — providing automated trading services. A regime for automated trading platforms. Technology controls, asset custody requirements, market surveillance obligations.

In addition the platform must qualify under the amended Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO), which since 2023 includes a dedicated regime for VASPs (Virtual Asset Service Providers).

What VATP licensing gives a user:

1. Asset segregation. Client funds must be held separately from the platform’s own balance sheet, with at least 98% in cold storage and insurance coverage.
2. Market surveillance. The platform monitors wash trading and manipulation and reports to SFC.
3. Per-token due-diligence. Before listing any token the exchange must conduct and publish a technical and legal review.
4. Complaint mechanism. A formal SFC complaint route exists against any licensed VATP. Complaints against unlicensed platforms have no procedural standing.

What VATP licensing does not protect against: market volatility, smart-contract bugs in DeFi (DEX and bridge risk sits outside the VATP perimeter), or sanctions exposure. SFC is explicit: a VATP licence covers infrastructure, not the quality of the assets traded.

Retail vs professional investor — the practical difference

Hong Kong draws a hard line between two investor categories — a central pillar of consumer protection.

A professional investor (PI) is defined in Schedule 1 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance:

• Individual with a portfolio of HK$8M or more (around US$1.03M at 2026 exchange rates).
• Trust corporation with HK$40M+ in assets under management.
• Corporate entity with HK$40M+ in assets or HK$8M+ in share capital.
• Regulated financial institutions (banks, insurers, funds).

A retail investor is everyone else.

What changes by status:

For a VATP this means that the “large-cap” boundary is an operationally critical question. SFC does not publish a hard list, but the criteria include: market-cap (roughly US$1B+), listing on at least two regulated venues in other jurisdictions, inclusion in two recognised indices, and adequate liquidity. Toncoin passes those gates — but every licensed VATP makes the call independently through its own due-diligence.

Spot ETFs in 2024: what was approved

In April 2024 the SFC approved the first spot Bitcoin and spot Ether ETFs — three issuers (China AMC, Harvest, Bosera-HashKey) launched products almost simultaneously. That made Hong Kong the second market after the US with physical crypto ETFs, and the only one in Asia.

Key features of the Hong Kong spot ETFs:

• In-kind creation/redemption. Unlike US ETFs which run cash-only creations, Hong Kong ETFs allow creation and redemption in native crypto. That tightens spreads and removes tax friction for large institutional participants.
• Retail access. Unlike Singapore where crypto ETFs are restricted to accredited investors, Hong Kong retail can buy them through any standard brokerage account.
• HKD and CNH-denominated tranches. Several ETFs offer parallel share classes in HKD and offshore yuan (CNH) — an attempt to position Hong Kong as a bridge for mainland-Chinese institutional flows.
• Connect not extended. The Stock Connect mechanism that ties HK and mainland-Chinese exchanges does not cover crypto ETFs — mainland investors cannot buy these products through Connect.

By mid-2026 assets under management in Hong Kong’s spot ETFs sit in the low single-digit billions of USD — an order of magnitude below the US counterparts, but more than any other non-US market. Spot ETFs for Toncoin or other alts have not been registered yet; SFC consistently notes that liquidity and due-diligence are assessed per asset.

OTC trading framework

In addition to VATP, the SFC and the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) published a 2024 consultation paper on an OTC trading framework — a separate regime for over-the-counter activity, including physical crypto-exchange shops.

State of practice by mid-2026:

• Physical exchange shops in Mongkok and Central — historically the grey-zone retail face of HK crypto — are being absorbed into VATP licensing as small VATPs or shut down.
• Institutional OTC desks (block trades between funds, large fixed-price swaps) remain a distinct category; the legislative draft was debated in the Legislative Council during 2025.
• Principal vs agent. The regulator distinguishes “trading on own account” (capital and licence required) from “broker-agent service” (lighter capital, agent regime).

For a TON holder needing to convert a large sum in Hong Kong, a VATP-licensed OTC desk is a practical route: tighter slippage than orderbook venues, documentation suitable for future source-of-funds audits, and a legal fiat on/off-ramp.

HKMA stablecoin licensing

The Stablecoins Ordinance, passed by the Legislative Council in December 2024 and effective from 1 August 2025, is a standalone regime for licensing fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers under HKMA.

What the ordinance requires:

• 100% reserves in high-quality liquid assets (HKD/USD treasuries, deposits at tier-1 banks).
• Monthly audit of reserves by an independent firm.
• Capital requirements — minimum HK$25M paid-up capital plus operational buffer.
• Right of redemption at par within one business day.
• No interest to stablecoin holders (mirroring the EU MiCA EMT rule).
• Hong Kong-incorporated entity.

Who is in scope:

• Issuers releasing a stablecoin in Hong Kong.
• Issuers actively marketing a stablecoin to Hong Kong residents, even if incorporated elsewhere.
• Platforms converting fiat HKD into a stablecoin (effectively an on-ramp from HKD).

Who is out of scope:

• USDT, USDC and other global stablecoins as long as their issuers do not actively market them to Hong Kong retail (trading on a VATP remains available).
• Algorithmic and decentralised stablecoins (DAI etc) — a grey zone; a separate consultation is expected in 2026-2027.
• Tokenised deposits from licensed banks — that is a separate HKMA regime.

By mid-2026 HKMA has issued its first licences, mostly to Hong Kong subsidiaries of international groups and to joint ventures with Chinese banks. The base-case projection is 5-8 licensed issuers by end of 2026, with concentration around HKD-pegged stablecoins.

TON in Hong Kong: where the ecosystem is looking

By mid-2026 the TON ecosystem has several anchor points in Hong Kong:

1. Toncoin on licensed VATPs. Several venues (HashKey, OSL and others) have completed due-diligence on Toncoin and offer HKD trading pairs to retail.
2. Project incorporation. A growing number of TON-builders incorporate Hong Kong entities for ease of dealing with Asian LPs and for VATP listing access. HK company law makes a private limited company available within 5-7 days through the e-Registry, which fits a startup cadence.
3. OTC and venture capital. Hong Kong family offices and crypto-focused funds (Hashkey Capital, MIRROR Ventures, and others) feature prominently in TON fundraises over 2024-2026.
4. Telegram presence. Hong Kong is one of the largest ARPU markets for Telegram in Asia after Japan, which makes HK a natural Telegram Mini-Apps GTM venue.

What is not yet in place:

• A Toncoin ETF (the framework would allow one, but liquidity and due-diligence criteria have not been formally validated for it).
• A TON-native HKD-stablecoin (the HKMA regime requires a Hong Kong-licensed issuer, which no current TON stablecoin project holds).
• Direct connect mechanisms between TON wallets and Hong Kong brokerage accounts (mid-2026 status — only through a VATP as an intermediary layer).

What it means for a TON-holding relocator

If you hold Toncoin and are considering Hong Kong as a residency or business base:

1. Residency is not easy. Hong Kong issues no “crypto visa”. Standard paths: Employment Visa (sponsored), Quality Migrant Admission Scheme (points-based on education and experience), Investment Visa (HK$30M+ into an active business, passive investments don’t count). “Buy residency with crypto” is not a route.
2. Tax is friendly but not zero. Hong Kong runs a territorial tax — only income earned “in Hong Kong” is taxable. Long-term crypto holding generally escapes CGT (Hong Kong has no capital-gains tax). But active trading qualifies as professional income — corporate profits tax 16.5% / personal 15%. The line between “investing” and “trading” is subjective; consultation is necessary.
3. Banking is a separate challenge. HSBC, Standard Chartered, Hang Seng remain reluctant to onboard customers with sizeable crypto exposure. ZA Bank, Mox and other virtual banks are more open, with size limits.
4. Corporate structure. A Hong Kong Private Limited Company is the default. Registration is fast, annual audit mandatory. Active crypto operations require careful analysis of whether a VATP licence is needed (if your entity trades on own account or serves HK residents).
5. Stablecoin flows. Receiving salary in USDT-on-TON in Hong Kong is technically possible, but converting into HKD through licensed infrastructure is smoother with USDC or future HKD-stablecoins.

Disclaimer: not legal advice

The Hong Kong crypto framework as of mid-2026 is operational but actively under construction. Pending items: a DeFi consultation by SFC in Q3 2026, detail on stablecoin licensing after the first issuers go live, a possible tokenised-securities regime. This article is a snapshot, not a guide to any specific transaction.

For substantial operations (six-figure USD and above), for incorporation, for tax residency moves — a licensed Hong Kong lawyer and a tax advisor are non-optional. Fees run into the low thousands of HKD. The cost of error: revoked licences, SFC penalties up to HK$10M, or back-taxes assessed by the IRD for prior years.

Conclusion

Hong Kong’s crypto regime in 2026 is one of those rare cases where a regulator neither blocks nor ignores — but writes working rules. VATP licensing, spot ETFs, the stablecoin ordinance, the OTC framework all interlock and produce a predictable legal environment for institutional players and (with limits) for retail.

The contrast with Singapore is striking. Over the past five years Singapore’s MAS has consistently tightened retail access — banning crypto marketing to retail in 2022, hardening the DPT regime in 2023, revoking licences in 2024-2025. Hong Kong has moved in the opposite direction. That does not mean HK is “better”: each model has its costs. But for a TON ecosystem actively building an Asia GTM, Hong Kong’s predictability is a real argument for incorporation.

For an individual Toncoin holder the practical value is more modest: the ability to trade on a licensed venue, future access to an ETF if one is approved, a clear tax framework for long-term holding. It is not a crypto-haven — but neither is it the rule-free risk zone many other Asian jurisdictions remain.