MyTonWallet vs Tonkeeper: a detailed 2026 comparison

Tonkeeper and MyTonWallet are the two main non-custodial wallets on TON. They overlap, but the philosophy differs: Tonkeeper is a mature product from ex-TON Labs engineers with a UX focus, MyTonWallet is open-source-first with aggressive multi-chain expansion. This piece is a detailed comparison across 12 axes with practical recommendations.

TL;DR — what to pick

• Polish and maturity — Tonkeeper.
• Fully open source — MyTonWallet.
• Multi-chain in one app — MyTonWallet.
• Daily TON DeFi — Tonkeeper.
• Paranoid setup — MyTonWallet plus Ledger plus an isolated Firefox profile.

Platforms and availability

MyTonWallet wins on browser coverage — Tonkeeper has no Firefox or Edge extension. If you keep your DeFi setup in a Firefox profile (a sensible isolation from the main browser), MyTonWallet is the only TON wallet that fits there natively.

Open source

MyTonWallet is fully open and has passed a CertiK audit — the report is public. Tonkeeper is open-core: critical cryptography is open, the mobile UI and backend integrations are closed. For most users that is irrelevant; for security-paranoid teams and compliance use-cases MyTonWallet is preferable.

Security

The base model is identical — seed generated locally, encrypted by the system keystore (Keychain / Android Keystore / Windows DPAPI), biometrics and PIN for unlock.

Where Tonkeeper leads:

• Signer mode — the phone acts as a hardware wallet for transactions signed from a laptop;
• Transaction simulation — before signing, you see what will happen to your balance;
• Anti-phishing labels — built-in list of known scam domains.

Where MyTonWallet leads:

• Full auditability — you can build it yourself, verify the binary hash;
• Anti-scam alerts — a dedicated module that reacts to common jetton phishing patterns (fake “airdrops” with identical names);
• Per-operation biometrics — separate setting, not just a global unlock.

Ledger support

Both wallets support Ledger Nano S Plus and Nano X via the TON app in Ledger Live. The flow is the same — install the TON app on the device, connect via USB or Bluetooth, import the account into the wallet.

UX nuance:

• In Tonkeeper the Ledger account shows up as a separate entry in the multi-account UI, switching is one tap.
• In MyTonWallet the Ledger account is a separate operating mode, the switch is a bit more “explicit”.

For specific steps and pitfalls see the Ledger guide.

MyTonWallet — open source with CertiK

Fully open code, audited, supports 8+ networks. Extensions for Chrome, Firefox, Edge.

→

Protocols and standards support

Both wallets handle TON Connect 2.0 correctly — hundreds of dApps recognise either. Some Telegram mini-apps are Tonkeeper-first and may behave inconsistently in MyTonWallet — that is a dApp dev issue, not a wallet one.

Swaps and on-ramp

Tonkeeper: integrated with MoonPay, Mercuryo, Neocrypto for fiat purchase (3–5%). Swaps via STON.fi and DeDust, fee 0.3–0.5% depending on routing.

MyTonWallet: purchase via Changelly and MoonPay, typically ~3.5%. Swaps via the in-app aggregator with a fixed 0.875% on top of network fees.

For occasional purchases the difference is negligible. For an active swapper ($1000+ daily volume) Tonkeeper saves tens of dollars a month. If you swap a lot, going directly to STON.fi or DeDust from either wallet is better — they have a wider pair selection.

Staking

Both wallets integrate liquid staking via Tonstakers, Hipo and bemo. APY is standard — 3–5% as of 2026, paid out in wrapped jettons (stTON, hTON, tsTON) usable in DeFi.

MyTonWallet has a native “Earn” section listing all available pools with APY and TVL. In Tonkeeper staking lives under “Buy / Earn” — the UX is slightly less linear, but functionality is the same.

Multi-chain

The fundamental divergence.

Tonkeeper — TON-only. The team has explicitly stated that specialisation beats breadth. Want Ethereum or Solana — use another wallet (MetaMask, Phantom).

MyTonWallet — multi-chain. As of 2026 it supports TON, TRON, Solana, Ethereum, Base, BNB, Polygon, Arbitrum. Bitcoin is on the roadmap. Convenient for users who do not want to juggle five wallets.

The downside of multi-chain is more attack surface. Each network is new code, new potential vulnerabilities. So if you only use MyTonWallet for TON, you can disable other networks in settings.

UX and localisation

Tonkeeper in 2026 feels like an iOS app of bank-grade calibre. MyTonWallet is more “engineer’s tool”: everything works, but priorities clearly favour functionality over animation polish.

What to pick in which scenario

Scenario 1: first wallet after the in-Telegram Wallet. Tonkeeper. Simpler UX, more docs, fewer mistakes.

Scenario 2: main DeFi wallet for active jetton trading. Tonkeeper. Transaction simulation and Signer mode save nerves and money.

Scenario 3: cold storage on a serious balance. Either plus Ledger. If open source matters — MyTonWallet.

Scenario 4: multi-chain (TON + Ethereum + Solana in one UI). MyTonWallet, no question.

Scenario 5: team / multi-sig. Tonkeeper or MyTonWallet as the signing client; multi-sig itself goes through specialised UIs.

Field log · 2025–2026

In our team we run a hybrid setup. Main DeFi account — Tonkeeper, because the transaction simulation has saved us from typos in the recipient address at least three times. Savings — MyTonWallet with Ledger in a separate Firefox profile. On the same seed there is also a watch-only Tonkeeper account so we can monitor the cold balance without opening it.

— TON Adoption

Bottom line

Both wallets in 2026 are excellent. If we had to pick one, we would take Tonkeeper for maturity and UX. But running both is the practical play: same seed, different roles. Tonkeeper for hot ops, MyTonWallet for cold and multi-chain.

Where to start — see the wallet selection guide and the Tonkeeper full review.

Sources

• tonkeeper.com — Tonkeeper.
• mytonwallet.io — MyTonWallet, CertiK report.
• docs.ton.org — TON Connect spec and wallet contract specs.